Legal Opinion

In re James R.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Initially, we note our disagreement with Family Court’s legal conclusion that these circumstances provided an insufficient predicate for the police officers to exercise their common-law right of inquiry (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223). The officers observed respondent carrying an apparently heavy, though not full, travel bag through an area known for its narcotics and weapons activities and the subject of a precinct alert that day. Respondent was flanked by three companions, one at each side and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McIntoshNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. In re Demitrus B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re William J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. B., DEMITRUS, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. McIntoshNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API