People v. Winship
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The defendant-appellant was convicted of second degree robbery and sentenced to seven and one-half to thirty years as a second felony offender.
The appellant has raised numerous grounds of error, only two of which merit discussion.
The appellant asserts that the trial court erred in refusing the defendant’s request for permission to remain outside of the courtroom while the People’s witnesses testified as to their description of the person who perpetrated the crime for which the defendant was indicted.
Section 356 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires that the defendant must be personally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- People v. La BarberaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- People v. DurlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Sturrock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. ScarolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. AikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People Ex Rel. Lupo v. FayNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- People v. CoffeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- State v. BrandtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.