Legal Opinion

Flack v. Graham

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 26, 1984No. 63919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

453 So.2d 819 (1984)

Evelyn R. FLACK, Petitioner,

v.

Bob GRAHAM and Gerald Lewis, Respondents.

No. 63919.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 26, 1984.

Rivers Buford, Jr. and Keith J. Kinderman, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Walter M. Meginniss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondents.

ADKINS, Justice.

Petitioner, Evelyn Flack, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to disburse state funds sufficient to recompense her for back salary unpaid by the comptroller as a result of an election contest. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(8), Fla. Const.

Petitioner was…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fitzsimmons v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Gentry v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Vega v. BURGETTSTOWN BOROUGH.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Hatton, Jr. v. JoughinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Gavagan v. MarshallSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chiles v. MilliganSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API