Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 10, 2009No. A07-36PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
The State charged appellant, David Michael Davis, with speeding and failing to provide proof that he had insurance on his vehicle. Davis moved to dismiss the charges, arguing that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. The court held that it had subject-matter jurisdiction, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed. Because we conclude that Congress has not preempted Minnesota from enforcing its traffic laws in state court under the circumstances presented here, we affirm.
On December 3, 2006, Davis was driving on State Highway 169 in Mille Lacs County,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jason Donald Matakis v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In re the Civil Commitment of JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Olson v. N.D. Dep't of Transp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Davis v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.