Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Beckermann

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided March 2, 1988No. CGCM 9996; Docket No. 896Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JOSEPHSON and BURGESS, Judges:

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).*

In United States v. Moorehead, 20 U.S.C.M.A. 574, 44 C.M.R. 4 (1971) the United States Court of Military Appeals answered the following certified issue in the negative:

“Was the Court of Military Review correct in determining that the Coast Guard’s method of assigning a military judge to a general court-martial complies with the requirements of Article 26(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice?”

Judge Baum’s opinion accurately portrays the underlying facts in both Moorehead, supra, and the instant case. Indeed, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MooreheadUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. SandersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API