Legal Opinion
People v. Pendergrast
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 28, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth L. Sussman, J.), entered on or about June 13, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Due to a typographical error in a cover letter attached to the risk assessment instrument, the People inadvertently agreed that defendant should be adjudicated a level one sex offender. Accordingly, the court properly exercised its discretion when it granted the People’s motion to “reopen” the sex offender registration proceeding (see…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. WrotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. DortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. BligenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. JoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Martinez v. Hudson Armored Car & Courier, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- People v. HahlbohmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026