Legal Opinion

Hopkirk v. Randolph

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia

Decided May 15, 1824PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In equity.

1Opinion of the Court

MARSHALL, Circuit Justice.

In the year 1790, the defendant, Randolph Harrison, intermarried with the defendant Mary, daughter of Thomas Randolph, deceased, who was then in possession of a maid-servant, a negro girl, and a riding-horse, which had been given her some years before by her father, who was at the time of the gift and of the intermarriage, possessed of a considerable estate. This property was, upon the intermarriage, retained by the donee, and has ever since remained in possession of Randolph Harrison. In the autumn of the year 1793, Thomas Randolph and his three sons, Archibald…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reade v. LivingstonNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  2. Salmon v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
  3. Sterry v. ArdenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lockhard v. BeckleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Van Wyck v. SewardNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Whitman v. HapgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  4. Drake v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Ringold v. SuiterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API