Legal Opinion

Josslyn v. Dahinden-Schmitz Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

As stated in plaintiff’s brief, this action is based upon a surety bond filed with the Railroad Commis*469sion. That bond was filed under, sec. 183.27, Stats. 1923, now sec. 189.08, Stats., relating to the sale of securities prior to obtaining a permit under sec. 189.07. The trial court ordered judgment for plaintiff against defendants Dahinden-Schmitz Company, a security broker, and the Standard Accident Insurance Company, as a surety on a bond filed under sec. 189.08 (2), on the theory that a sale of bonds as Class “A” securities by the broker to plaintiff on an order procured from him on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waisbren v. BlinkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klatt v. Guaranteed Bond Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Waller Carson & Co. v. LeedomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Chas. A. Krause Milling Co. v. Chris. Schroeder & Son Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API