Legal Opinion
Precision Fabrics Grp., Inc. v. Tietex Int'l, Ltd.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 8, 2019No. 7:17-cv-3037; 7:17-cv-3038PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
These patent infringement actions are before the court on two post-trial motions filed by Precision Fabrics Group, Inc. ("PFG") for relief from a jury verdict that found that Defendant Tietex International, Ltd. ("Tietex") did not infringe its U.S. Patents Nos. 8,796,162 ('162 Patent) and 8,501,639 ('639 Patent) for flame-retardant technology for fabrics. PFG renews its prior motion for judgment as a matter of law and moves in the alternative for a new trial. (Doc. 372.)1 After careful consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the motions will be…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Trudell Medical International v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023