Legal Opinion

Rabuck v. Pollack & Rosen, PA

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 19, 2025No. 6:24-cv-01586Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION SARAH RABUCK, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:24-cv-1586-PGB-DCI POLLACK & ROSEN, P.A., Defendant. / ORDER This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff Sarah Rabuck’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Strike Defendant Pollack & Rosen, P.A.’s (“Defendant”) Affirmative Defenses. (Doc. 31 (the “Motion to Strike”)). Defendant responded in opposition. (Doc. 32). Upon consideration, the Motion to Strike is due to be granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND1 This lawsuit arises from an alleged dispute involving Defendant’s attempts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tiffany Williams v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Reyher v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  5. Anchor Hocking Corp. v. Jacksonville Electric AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API