Flowers v. State

The appellant asserts that the state failed to present sufficient evidence that his crimes, burglary of a dwelling and robbery, were committed with a firearm. Sufficient direct and circumstantial evidence, however, was presented from which *413a jury could reasonably conclude that appellant possessed a firearm during the commission of these offenses. Crump v. State, 629 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); T.T. v. State, 459 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Although no weapons were recovered, the victim testified that he was certain that the appellant and the appellant’s accomplice both had guns. The…