In the Interest of T.T. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
JOANOS, Judge.
Appellant contends there was insufficient evidence adduced at trial to support a finding of guilt and insufficient evidence to ■ establish that a firearm was used in the robbery for which he was adjudicated delinquent. We do not agree and affirm.
Appellant was identified as the perpetrator of the robbery through voice identification by the two victims, one of whom had known appellant for ten years. Voice identification is direct and positive *472proof the probative value of which is determined by the finder of fact. Mack v. State, 54 Fla. 55, 44 So. 706 (1907).
Both victims testified…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Mack v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- I.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- J. L. J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Toler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Fletcher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Akins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.