Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 11, 2008No. 3143061Published

1DissentHaley, J.

I respectfully dissent because I believe the majority (1) fails to meaningfully distinguish our decision in London v. Commonwealth, 49 Va.App. 230, 638 S.E.2d 721 (2006), and (2) incorrectly concludes that consideration of Code § 19.2-159.1(B) is barred in deciding the question presented in this appeal.

ANALYSIS

(D

“An accused’s right to be represented by counsel is a fundamental component of our criminal justice system.” Paris v. Commonwealth, 9 Va.App. 454, 459, 389 S.E.2d 718, 721 (1990) (quoting United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 653, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 2043, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984)).

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. D. Spencer Grow and C. Oran MensikCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API