Legal Opinion
Haag v. Cuyahoga County
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 9, 1985No. C83-4271PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
KRENZLER, District Judge.
This is another Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case (hereinafter referred to as § 1983) in which the plaintiff, Robert Haag, 1 a father, is alleging that his constitutional right of visitation with his children has been infringed upon by the various defendants under color of law.
Plaintiffs principal argument is that because the Cuyahoga County Welfare Department did not meet its mandated statutory duty, pursuant to Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2151.421, he was denied the above-noted right of visitation.
The specific duty alleged to have been breached by…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Michael F. Hahn and Marie Hahn v. Star BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Brown v. NewbergerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Brodie v. Summit County Children Services BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Thomas v. Beth Israel Hospital Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.