Legal Opinion

Harkeem v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 28, 1975No. 7165PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

This case involves the validity of a regulation of the department of employment security under which the plaintiff was denied unemployment compensation benefits by reason of his voluntary retirement. The plaintiff, then age sixty-eight, voluntarily retired from his employment at Encore Shoe Corporation in Manchester on March 23, 1973. He filed for unemployment compensation which was denied in May 1973 because he had voluntarily retired. Early in August 1973, Mr. Harkeem was hired by Miller Shoe-Dover to replace a lasting room foreman who was hospitalized. In mid-September this employment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wellman v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  2. Fernald v. BassettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  3. Clark v. N.H. Department of Health & WelfareSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Kimball v. New Hampshire Board of AccountancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Reno v. Town of HopkintonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. Archambault v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Phetteplace v. Town of LymeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API