Legal Opinion
Ray v. Deas
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 8, 1965No. 41387PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Franktjm, Judge.
1. “Any person who knowingly or carelessly sells to another unwholesome provisions of any kind, the defect being unknown to the purchaser, by the use of which damage results to the purchaser or his family, shall be liable in damages for such injury.” Code § 105-1101. It has been held, in applying the principles enunciated by this Code section, that one who negligently furnishes food or drink containing a foreign substance which causes injury or damage to the consumer thereof may be held liable therefor. Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co., 124 Ga. 121 (52 SE 152, 1 LRA (NS) 1178,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Rowe v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Yeo v. PIG & WHISTLE SANDWICH SHOPS INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Bailey v. F. W. Woolworth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pierce v. Liberty Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Williams v. Braum Ice Cream Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Mitchell v. BBB Services Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Bronson v. Club Comanche, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1968
- Sirmons v. Derst Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.