Legal Opinion

Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1967No. Calendar 8, Docket 51,371PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

Three distinct appellate issues requiring our construction of our workmen’s compensation act 1 are presented by this appeal. 2 First, we must determine whether an employee injured in the course of his employment is entitled to cumulative specific loss awards for loss of a leg and also for loss of the foot of that leg when, in an effort to save as much of the leg as was medically possible, a guillotine amputation of the foot was performed and subsequently a definitive operation above the foot but below the knee was performed. Second, we must determine whether the employee is entitled to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. BeckmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Williams v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American YeomenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State Highway Commissioner v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Wilson v. McCabe & DishawMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KurylowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Cronin v. Minster PressMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Buechler v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API