Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.
Three distinct appellate issues requiring our construction of our workmen’s compensation act 1 are presented by this appeal. 2 First, we must determine whether an employee injured in the course of his employment is entitled to cumulative specific loss awards for loss of a leg and also for loss of the foot of that leg when, in an effort to save as much of the leg as was medically possible, a guillotine amputation of the foot was performed and subsequently a definitive operation above the foot but below the knee was performed. Second, we must determine whether the employee is entitled to a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Detroit v. BeckmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Williams v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American YeomenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- State Highway Commissioner v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Wilson v. McCabe & DishawMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by25 opinions
- Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KurylowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Cronin v. Minster PressMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Buechler v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.