Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Solchenberger

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1960No. 6 Div. 81PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court denying relief in equity and retransferring the cause to the law side there to be tried on the merits. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has filed also in this court an original petition for mandamus in the alternative and seeks to review the decree complained of by that procedure if said decree will not support an appeal.

A decree retransferring a cause from equity back to law where…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Moon's Adm'r v. CrowderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Miles v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Ellis v. BurdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  5. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boles v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Dow-United Technologies Composite Products, Inc. v. WebsterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. Hall v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Sager v. Royce Kershaw Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API