Legal Opinion

Manley v. Manley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. F. H. Heiskell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The complainant, Bridget, is the widow of Joseph H. Manley, who died in June, 1895, and the defendant, Margaret Manley, was his *192mother. In the year 1882, the deceased, Joseph, became a member of *a local lodge in Memphis, this being a subordinate lodge of an order known as the “Brotherhood of Locomotive Fireman.” At the time of becoming a member he was an unmarried man, living with his mother, and continued to do so until his marriage^ to the complainant, Bridget, in the year 1886. By section 48 of the constitution of the order all members, save those disqualified as the result of a medical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Catholic Order of Foresters v. CallahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Lane v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hanna v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Supreme Ruler of the Fraternal Mystic CircleTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Alfsen v. CrouchTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. National Union v. KeefeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. LaRocca v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. National Union v. Shaw, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API