Legal Opinion

Dowell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1952No. 1174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

A jury found Elizabeth Dowell guilty of the statutory offense of practicing the healing art without a license, Code 1940, § 2-101 et seq., and she has brought this appeal.

We direct our attention first to a part of the judge’s jury instructions which appellant says casts upon her an improper and excessive burden of proof in connection with her defense. The Government concedes that the instruction was erroneous and consents to a remand for a new trial. But despite such confession of error we must examine the question independently because “public interest prevents shifting…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  2. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Holloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Turner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API