Legal Opinion
Blackey v. Alexander
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 19, 1923No. 23,512PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
■ This is an action to set aside because of alleged usury a note for $1,000 and the real estate mortgage securing it. Plaintiff is the immediate successor in interest of the mortgagor, not only as the owner of the mortgaged premises, but also as the mortgagor’s as-signee of all causes of action arising out of the note and mortgage in suit. The case was tried to the court. There were findings for defendants, except as hereinafter indicated, and, from the denial of a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
The mortgagor was John A. Blackey, a brother of plaintiff and co-heir with him to the real estate in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wadsworth v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jordan v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Lewis v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Venie v. Harriet State Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Bovee v. ButtersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Estate of LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Faber v. EnkemaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.