Rosenkranz v. Guaranty Trust Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The amended complaint in this action alleges a cause of action in replevin, or for the redelivery of certain Grandview Irrigation District, Snipes Mountain Irrigation District and Yakima County Sub. 9 of Dist. No. 3 Drainage Improvement District bonds numbers 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. The answer of appellants to the amended complaint consists of denials of the allegations of the amended complaint, and an affirmative defense and cross-complaint, setting forth copies of the bonds sought to be recovered and an allegation that all the bonds are negotiable bonds, purchased in good faith, and that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Russell v. American Bell Telephone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Scollans v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- County of King v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Linn v. ReidWashington Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allen v. GraafWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. McNealCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. McNealDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1933