Commonwealth v. Gatewood
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Packel, J.,
This appeal from the denial of nunc pro tunc post-trial motions is based upon (1) the unavailability of a significant part of the notes of testimony, and (2) the denial by the trial court of an offer to prove, by the attorney for a co-defendant, a prior inconsistent statement of a witness as to a material matter.
The appellant has been convicted of aggravated robbery and aggravated assault and battery in connection with the holdup of a cab driver during the first hours of May 12, 1963. At the trial, the cab driver stated that he was robbed by three passengers and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. DennisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. FontanaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. FontanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.