Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gatewood

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1972No. Appeals, 136 and 137PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packel, J.,

This appeal from the denial of nunc pro tunc post-trial motions is based upon (1) the unavailability of a significant part of the notes of testimony, and (2) the denial by the trial court of an offer to prove, by the attorney for a co-defendant, a prior inconsistent statement of a witness as to a material matter.

The appellant has been convicted of aggravated robbery and aggravated assault and battery in connection with the holdup of a cab driver during the first hours of May 12, 1963. At the trial, the cab driver stated that he was robbed by three passengers and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. DennisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. FontanaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. FontanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API