Howell v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

The opinion of the court was. delivered by

Kalisch, J.

This case in its salient features is like Fidelity and Plate Glass Insurance Company against this defendant, reported in 92 N. J. L. 467.

The facts of that case, which gave rise to the questions concerning the alleged negligence of the defendant, are practically the same here, and, therefore, need not be reiterated. There the main questions were whether the facts which appeared from the plaintiff’s proof tended to establish negligence *214of the defendant, and whether the correct legal principles governing those facts were property stated by the…