Page v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, P. J.
In this action on a fire insurance policy, the insurance company asserted the affirmative defense that at the time of the fire the covered premises “ had been unoccupied beyond a period of sixty consecutive days at the time of the alleged loss set forth in the complaint ”. The policy provided, as one of the “ conditions suspending insurance ”, that the company should not be liable “ for loss occurring ” while the building ‘ ‘ is vacant or unoccupied beyond a period of sixty consecutive days”. The burden is upon the insurer to establish this affirmative defense. (21 Appleman, Insurance Law and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dean v. Tower InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Coutu v. Exchange InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- McCabe v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Twelve Ninety Smithtown Corp. v. New York Mutual UnderwritersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Dean v. Tower InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.