Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dean v. Tower Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2012Published

1Dissent

Jones, J. (dissenting).

The homeowners’ policy at issue on this appeal provides coverage for a “residence premises” which is defined as the “family dwelling, other structures, and grounds,” or “[t]hat part of any . . . building . . . where you reside.” Thus, the proper inquiry is whether plaintiffs resided at the subject premises—an outcome predicated on the simple application of the plain meaning of the term “reside” to the policy. The majority declines to do so, however, agreeing with the Appellate Division that the absence of an express definition of “reside,” coupled with plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. KliglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Vigilant Insurance v. Bear Stearns CompaniesNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Canfield v. Peerless InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. PaolicelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API