Legal Opinion
Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 23, 2024No. 3:16-cv-05961Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 GLORA ROMAN, GERARDO VASQUEZ, JUAN AGUILAR, and all other similarly 11 situated, No. 3:16-cv-05961-WHA 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 v. MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND 14 JAN-PRO FRANCHISING ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS, AND INTERNATIONAL, INC., EXPENSES 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this wage-and-hour misclassification class action, plaintiffs move for final approval of 19 a class settlement. This order finds that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. 20 Therefore,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers Bodine Produce Company, Inc. Robert Fletcher, D/B/A Fletcher FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.