Danforth v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
On petition of the Government we granted a rehearing limited to the single *319question of whether a taking of the appellant’s property has resulted from the operations of the Government in carrying out the provisions of the Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, 33 U. S.C.A. § 702a et seq., and if so the date upon which the taking occurred.
The argument, as originally presented, centered around the appellant’s contention that in the proceedings brought by the Government to condemn a flowage easement over his land the lower court was in error in refusing to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gibson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bedford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. HalmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012