Board of Commissioners v. Prudden & Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The defendant submits two propositions — first, that the form of the bonds is not such as the statute requires; and, second, that the provision in regard to the issuance and payment of the bonds is indefinite, uncertain, and void. If the first proposition is sound, the second need not be considered.
Prior to the adoption of the act codifying- the laws relating to public schools, the trustees of a school district were authorized to issue the bonds of such district in its corporate name. Public Laws 1919, chs. 143, 308; Public Laws, Extra Session 1920, ch. 87, secs. 1, 2; School Com. v. Board of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- School Committee of Seventy-First Consolidated School District v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Commissioners of Wilkes County v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Commissioners of New Hanover County v. DerossetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carr v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924