City of Marysville v. N. Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the county of Yuba, refusing to change the place of trial of the action. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This action was brought to abate a nuisance, which it was alleged was causing injury to real property in the county of Yuba, where the action was commenced and is still pending. An action for injuries to real property must be tried in the county in which the subject of the action or some part thereof is situated, subject to the power of the court to change the place of trial as provided in the code. (C. C. P., § 392.)
Being an action “ for injuries to real property,” it is not within the class of cases which “ must be tried in the county in which the defendants, or some of them,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Glines v. MattaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
- People v. Selby Smelting and Lead Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- McClatchy v. Laguna Lands LimitedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Las Animas & San Joaquin Land Co. v. FatjoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Crabb v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.