Legal Opinion

Martin v. Humphrey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1899No. 8772PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below before Holmes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This suit was instituted by William S. Martin to foreclose two real estate mortgages, executed by the defendant Inez C. Humphrey and Albert H. Humphrey. A judgment for any deficiency remaining upon the sale of the mortgaged premises was prayed against the defendant Catherine D. Becker, to whom it is alleged that the property had been conveyed by the mortgagors, and that in the deed she had assumed and agreed to pay the mortgages. The. answer of Mrs. Becker, after denying each averment of the petition, pleaded that the conveyance of the property to her was made without her knowledge, that she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hare v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Coolidge v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Morrow v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Exchange Bank v. Nebraska Underwriters InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Keedle v. FlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brownson v. HannahSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Coleman v. BeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Warder, Bushnell & Glessner Co. v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API