Legal Opinion

Myhaver v. Knutson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1997No. CV-96-0400-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*287OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

Plaintiffs Bruce and Barbara Myhaver sought review of a court of appeals’ decision holding that the “sudden emergency” instruction was properly given in a case arising out of an automobile collision. See Myhaver v. Knutson, No. 2 CA-CV 95-0279 (Ariz.Ct. App. May 21,1996) (Memorandum Decision). We granted review to determine whether a sudden emergency instruction is ever appropriate under the principles espoused in Ro-sen v. Knaub, 175 Ariz. 329, 857 P.2d 381 (1993) (disapproving the “sudden appearance” instruction), and Petefish v. Dawe, 137 Ariz. 570, 672 P.2d 914…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Knapp v. StanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hallett v. Town of WrenthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. McKEE BY McKEE v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. DiCenzo v. IzawaHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Young v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beyer v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Moran v. Atha Trucking, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MirandaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State Farm v. MirandaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Moran v. Atha Trucking, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API