Newsum v. Interstate Realty Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
Complainants, owning certain valuable real estate, placed it for sale with more than one agency. The two defendants both claiming commissions on the sale, this bill was filed as a bill of interpleader, or in the nature of ■ a-bill of interpleader, and, in the alternative, as a proceeding under the Declaratory Judgments Act of 1923, •chapter 29.
•. It is an essential of 'an interpleader bill, or of a bill of ■this nature, that the complainant be liable to one only of the parties defendant, never by any possibility to both. The amonnt or value of the obligation must not be in dispute, but the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maxwell v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Hoyt v. GougeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Sachsel v. FarrarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
3Cited by47 opinions
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Evans Products Co. v. State Board of EscheatsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.