Brock v. Marlatt
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*278OPINION
By GUERNSEY, J.
Under the statute, and the rules of practice of this court, the errors pointed out in the brief will be the only ones considered, and they will be considered in the order mentioned.
In our opinion there were no irregularities in the voir dire examination and such examination was within the rule laid down in the case of Pavilonis v Valentine, 120 Oh St 54, and fully justified by the provisions of §§11437 and 11438 GC. See Slosser v Ragorin, 185 NE 210 (14 Abs 302), recently decided by this court, certification of which was refused by the Supreme Court.
While the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Valentine v. PavilonisOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
- Valentine v. PavilonisOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
- Masters, Admx. v. Von LehmdenOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Slosser v. LagorinOhio Court of Appeals · 1933