Masters, Admx. v. Von Lehmden
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
There are several specifications of error, but the only important point of error presented in the record is the complaint that the court failed to charge on wilful and wanton negligence, although such charge was requested by the plaintiff and was one of the issues in the case, made by the pleadings.
The trial court charged fully on the doctrine of last clear chance, which, under the facts of the case, is a doubtful issue.
It appears from the record that plaintiff’s decedent, a workingman at a foundry, in company with two other men, at the close of their work, started across Colerain Avenue, a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brock v. MarlattOhio Court of Appeals · 1933