Legal Opinion

United States v. Judith Kay Levinson Elliot Lane Levinson Equs Distributing, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1993No. 92-10256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals an order of the district court suppressing evidence in its prosecution of Judith Kay Levinson, Elliot Lane Levinson and Equs Distributing, Inc. (the defendants) for conspiracy against the United States and the transportation of obscene materials in interstate commerce. United States v. Levinson, 790 F.Supp. 1472 (D.Nev.1992). We reverse the district court.

PROCEEDINGS

The United States presented to a magistrate in Los Angeles the affidavit of Allan J. Rogers, Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation who was assigned to Los Angeles.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DePugh v. PenningDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  2. Multi-Media Distributing Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  3. Devils Films, Inc. v. Nectar VideoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  4. United States v. McCoyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API