Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Memorandum The demand which is necessary to start the running of the Statute of Limitations must be made within a reasonable time. Here, as matter of law, the action is barred by the statute. •
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.
Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., dissents and ■votes for affirmance on the ground that under the circumstances present the question of whether demand was made within a reasonable time was one of fact to be determined on trial.
Order reversed, etc.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Guggenheim Foundation v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- DeWeerth v. BaldingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Martin v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Peters v. Sotheby's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.