Legal Opinion
KORNHAUSER v. ORTIZ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 3, 2020No. 1:19-cv-21710Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JULIUS KORNHAUSER, Civil Action No. 19-21710 (RBK) Petitioner, v. OPINION AND ORDER WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ, Respondent. Before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, applicable to § 2241 cases through Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, this Court has screened the Petition for dismissal and determined, with the following caveats, that dismissal without an answer and the record is not warranted. The Court will…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- James Callwood v. Jerry Enos , Director, Bureau of Correction Chesley Roebuck, Chairman of V.I. Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Leamer v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.