Kirschling v. Atlantic City Board of Education
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge:
This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendant Atlantic City Board of Education’s motion [Doc. No. 58] for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions and decides this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78.
For the reasons expressed below, Defendant’s motion will be granted.
I. JURISDICTION
Plaintiff brings this action against Defendant Atlantic City Board of Education (“Defendant” or “the Board”) asserting claims under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“NJLAD”),…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ewell v. NBA Properties, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Nuness v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Brown v. R.R. Grp. Ltd. Liab. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- ALI v. HILLSTONE RESTAURANT GROUPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- BRADLEY v. JUST GREENS, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.