Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Knight v. deGraffenried

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1933No. 6 Div. 319PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSTER, Justice.

The acquittal of defendant on a criminal charge is not a bar to the enforcement of a civil right by the state against the same defendant based upon the facts which constituted such criminal charge, 2 Freeman on Judgments, § 656, p. 1384; Stone v. U. S., 167 U. S. 178, 17 S. Ct. 77S, 42 L. Ed. 127; State v. Lewis, 164 Wis. 363, 159 N. W. 746, unless the civil right thus sought to be enforced is itself a proceeding for the further punishment of the defendant. Under such circumstances “it is regarded as a second attempt to punish for the same crime, and a previous acquittal is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Attorney General v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mullis v. MathewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Ex Parte State Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Barlett v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Bartlett v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API