State Ex Rel. Knight v. deGraffenried
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
POSTER, Justice.
The acquittal of defendant on a criminal charge is not a bar to the enforcement of a civil right by the state against the same defendant based upon the facts which constituted such criminal charge, 2 Freeman on Judgments, § 656, p. 1384; Stone v. U. S., 167 U. S. 178, 17 S. Ct. 77S, 42 L. Ed. 127; State v. Lewis, 164 Wis. 363, 159 N. W. 746, unless the civil right thus sought to be enforced is itself a proceeding for the further punishment of the defendant. Under such circumstances “it is regarded as a second attempt to punish for the same crime, and a previous acquittal is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Mullis v. MathewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Ex Parte State Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Barlett v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Bartlett v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.