Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mullis v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1953No. 4 Div. 701PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an impeachment proceeding originally commenced in this Court by the filing of an information by E. E. Mullís and four other individuals in their own behalf and in the name of the State of Alabama on their relation, wherein they aver in twenty-four specifications that the respondent, H. Ralph Mathews, Jr., Sheriff of Russell County, is guilty of willful neglect of duty. *129There is no charge of the other constitutional grounds of impeachment, viz., corruption- in office, incompetency, intemperance or an offense involving moral turpitude. The information alleges that E. E. Mulli9 and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. TallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. BuckleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parker v. AmersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Lewis v. State Ex Rel. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Munchus v. ConradiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Alonzo v. State ex rel. BoothSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API