Deering v. Schreyer
New York Supreme Court
Demurrer by plaintiff to several portions of the amended answer of the defendant Schreyer.
1Opinion of the CourtTruax, J.
This is a demurrer to several portions of the amended answer of the defendant Schreyer. The gist of the separate defense set up in paragraph 11 of the answer, to which separate' defense plaintiff demurs on the ground that it is insufficient upon the face thereof, in that the facts therein alleged do not constitute a defense to the amended complaint, is that the plaintiff, while-acting, as the attorney for the defendant Schreyer, was also acting for another person who was interested generally, in obtaining the same ldnd of relief that the defendant Schreyer was interested in • obtaining. This…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Biershenk v. StokesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lessing v. GibbonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Deering v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1906