Deering v. . Schreyer
New York Court of Appeals
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Apjiellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 7,1906, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment of Special Term in an action to determine the amount to which plaintiff was entitled under a contract of employment as attorney in a proceeding to obtain compensation for damages to property by reason of a street opening.
1Per curiam
The essential facts of this case have been stated many times during its passage through the courts. (Matter of Lexington Avenue, 30 App. Div. 602; 157 N. Y. 678; Deering v. Schreyer, 27 Misc. Rep. 237; 40 App. Div. 633; 58 App. Div. 322; 171 N. Y. 451; 88 App. Div. 457; 110 App. Div. 200.)
The main controversy at the present stage of the litigation is over the items of interest and taxes, and we lay down the following as the rules to govern the distribution of the fund with reference to those subjects:
1. Neither party should pay to the other interest on the fund or any part thereof while it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deering v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In re the Board of Street Opening & ImprovementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Deering v. SchreyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Deering v. SchreyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Deering v. SchreyerNew York Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Evancovich v. Schiller, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- MacIntyre v. State Bank of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953