Legal Opinion
Kowalczyk v. Kleszczynski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 18, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShannon, J.
The plaintiff alleged that the defendant seduced and carnally knew the plaintiff’s wife, Janina Kowalczyk. As a result of this action, the plaintiff claims that he has lost her affection, has been deprived of her society and assistance, which he otherwise would have had, and has suffered great distress of body and mind. The court found the issues for the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed.
The defendant assigned as error the court’s finding of three paragraphs of facts without evidence. The stipulated joint appendix does not include any evidence to support them. Therefore, we are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Erwin v. EnglishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Flynn v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Engelke v. WheatleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Cushing v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Curtin v. FranchettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Dooley v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. John F.M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Barrett-Nonpareil, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.