Erwin v. English
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action for recovery of possession of land, with rents and profits; brought to the District Court of Waterbury. The original plaintiffs were John Erwin and wife ; during the pendency of the suit Cephalia P. Larkin was admitted as a plaintiff, and, she dying before the trial, John Erwin entered as administrator of her estate, and, with his wife, withdrew individually from the case; so that, at the time of the trial the only plaintiff was John Erwin as administrator.
Read the full summary
Action for recovery of possession of land, with rents and profits; brought to the District Court of Waterbury. The original plaintiffs were John Erwin and wife ; during the pendency of the suit Cephalia P. Larkin was admitted as a plaintiff, and, she dying before the trial, John Erwin entered as administrator of her estate, and, with his wife, withdrew individually from the case; so that, at the time of the trial the only plaintiff was John Erwin as administrator. The case was tried to the court before JRorabach, J., who made a finding of the facts and rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The…
1Opinion of the CourtSeymour, J.
This is a complaint to obtain possession of the premises therein described, together with rents and profits. It was originally brought March 25th, 1885, by John Erwin and Mary Erwin, husband and wife. Subsequently Cephalia P. Larkin appeared, and by leave of the court was made a party plaintiff. She afterwards died, her death was suggested on the record, and said John Erwin entered, as her administrator, to prosecute as such administrator. At the term of the court when the case was tried John Erwin, in his individual capacity, and his wife Mary, were dropped as plaintiffs, and the case, with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DoorisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
- Erwin v. EnglishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Pittinger v. PittingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
- In re the Application for Letters of Administration de Bonis Non on the Goods, Chattels & Credits of MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.