Legal Opinion

Wrangler Apparel Corp. v. United States

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided July 22, 1996No. 2:94cv481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BEATY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff and Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This is an action for a tax refund of $17,-730,600 based upon an alleged “greenmail” payment made in connection with the purchase of common stock. Plaintiff, Wrangler Apparel Corp., merged with Blue Bell, Inc. (“Blue Bell”) and has assumed Blue Bell’s tax refund claim, though the events which give rise to this refund claim occurred while Blue Bell was an independent entity.

From 1981 to November 1983 various entities controlled by the Bass…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Commissioner v. DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Blau v. LehmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Fay M. Campbell v. Hewitt, Coleman & Associates, Incorporated Peoples Security Life Insurance Company, and Interiors, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BergbauerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. True Homes, LLC v. CMH Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API