Maurice Baker v. David Hawkins and Christie Hawkins
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence-Berrey, J. —
¶1 We must determine whether service on a contractor, who spent every day for one month working at the defendants’ home, returning only to his home at night to sleep, is service on a person “then resident therein” for purposes of former RCW 4.28.080(15) (2012) (now codified at RCW 4.28.080(16)). We hold that because the contractor was not “actually living in” the defendants’ home as required by Salts v. Estes, 133 Wn.2d 160, 170, 943 P.2d 275 (1997), service was deficient under the statute. We therefore affirm the trial court’s order dismissing this action as barred by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- SentinelC3, Inc. v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Salts v. EstesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Salts v. EstesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baker v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 2016