Legal Opinion

Maurice Baker v. David Hawkins and Christie Hawkins

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 22, 2015No. 33228-4-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence-Berrey, J. —

¶1 We must determine whether service on a contractor, who spent every day for one month working at the defendants’ home, returning only to his home at night to sleep, is service on a person “then resident therein” for purposes of former RCW 4.28.080(15) (2012) (now codified at RCW 4.28.080(16)). We hold that because the contractor was not “actually living in” the defendants’ home as required by Salts v. Estes, 133 Wn.2d 160, 170, 943 P.2d 275 (1997), service was deficient under the statute. We therefore affirm the trial court’s order dismissing this action as barred by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. SentinelC3, Inc. v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Salts v. EstesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Salts v. EstesWashington Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API