Legal Opinion

MATTER OF SPITZER v. Farrell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2003PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wesley, J.

In May 1996, the Legislature amended the Environmental Conservation Law, requiring New York City to close Staten Island’s Fresh Kills landfill by January 1, 2002 (see ECL 27-0706). The New York City Department of Sanitation (DOS) sought to reduce the amount of waste deposited in Fresh Kills in the interim until the City could adopt a final plan. In that regard, DOS in 1999 proposed the “Manhattan plan,” which required diesel-powered sanitation trucks to transport waste to facilities in New Jersey daily via the George Washington Bridge and the Holland and Lincoln…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Chinese Staff & Workers Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. MATTER OF MERSON v. McNallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Spitzer v. FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Chinese Staff & Workers' Ass'n v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Landmark West! v. BurdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Thirty West Park Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Matter of Friends of P.S. 163, Inc. v. Jewish Home Lifecare, ManhattanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Hells Kitchen Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API