Legal Opinion

Eberhart v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1893No. 16,868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The appellant was indicted for the crime of rape, was tried therefor, and found and adjudged guilty.

It is conten 'ed that the evidence does not sustain the verdict..

The prosecuting witness, Lettie G. Mohler, was thirteen years of age, past, and for two or three years had been subject to epileptic fits. Her' father was a day laborer; while both father and mother were ignorant and credulous, to an extreme degree, though apparently well-minded persons. The girl herself had not gone to school since she had been afflicted with epilepsy, and had gone out nowhere except when accompanied by her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Commonwealth v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Pomeroy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Ledley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Huber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Rahke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ransbottom v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hawkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Felton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API