Ransbottom v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From tlie Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
The appellant was convicted in the Marshall Circuit Court of rape, alleged in the indictment to have been committed on one Esther Schroll on December 4,1894.
Many errors are assigned, among which are the overruling of appellant’s motion to quash the indictment, overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, overruling his motion for, and in arrest of, judgment. The only reason urged in argument in support *252of the motion, to quash and in arrest is that the record does not disclose that the indictment was recorded as required by section 1741, R. S. 1894, (R. S. 1881, section 1672). It was settled…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- McDermott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Commonwealth v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Beard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Dewey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
- Rahke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.